Developer & Tech
Embedding Storage Calculator
Enter your details
Runs in your browser
How to use it
Using the embedding storage calculator
- 01
Enter collection size
Expected steady-state vector count, not today’s count if growth is planned.
- 02
Match model dimensions
Your embedding model’s spec fixes this number; custom covers exotic models.
- 03
Consider precision drops
fp16 halves storage versus fp32 and int8 quarters it; usually worth small recall losses.
Good to know
Where the multiplier goes
Graph indexes store neighbor lists alongside vectors; IVF stores centroid assignments; every engine keeps deletion bitmaps and ID maps. The 1.5× figure covers modest HNSW settings; aggressive M values or huge metadata can double it, which is why we call it a heuristic.
Quantization economics
Product or scalar quantization shrinks footprints 4–32× with modest recall loss, often making the difference between one beefy node and a cluster. Disk-backed indexes extend the trade to storage, swapping cheap disk for higher query latency.
How it's calculated
The math behind this calculator
raw = vectors × dims × bytes/dim
withIndex = raw × 1.5 (HNSW-style heuristic)Each vector occupies dimensions × bytes-per-dimension; multiply by count for the raw payload. Approximate nearest-neighbor structures add links, metadata and load-factor slack, so a stated 1.5× multiplier estimates realistic memory; labeled a heuristic because HNSW parameters and engines vary widely.
Assumptions & limitations
- 1.5× index/memory overhead is a named heuristic, not a guarantee.
- Metadata payloads and IDs not included.
- Quantization trades recall for footprint; benchmark before committing.
Worked example
One million 1536-dimension fp32 vectors occupy about 5.72 GiB raw, roughly 8.58 GiB once typical index overhead lands; provision ~9 GiB of RAM.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
- Does this include document text storage?
- No; only vector payloads plus index structure. Source documents usually live in cheaper object storage beside the index.
- Why GiB instead of GB?
- Memory provisioning uses binary GiB; mixing decimal GB into RAM planning under-provisions nodes by ~7%.
- How accurate is 1.5× really?
- Directionally right for common setups. Measure your engine after load tests; Qdrant/pgvector/Milvus publish their own overhead guidance.
Keep exploring