Developer & Tech

Embedding Storage Calculator

What this does

Size the memory footprint of a vector collection from count, dimensions and precision, including index overhead and RAM guidance.

Enter your details

Runs in your browser

Calculator inputs

Using the embedding storage calculator

  1. 01

    Enter collection size

    Expected steady-state vector count, not today’s count if growth is planned.

  2. 02

    Match model dimensions

    Your embedding model’s spec fixes this number; custom covers exotic models.

  3. 03

    Consider precision drops

    fp16 halves storage versus fp32 and int8 quarters it; usually worth small recall losses.

Where the multiplier goes

Graph indexes store neighbor lists alongside vectors; IVF stores centroid assignments; every engine keeps deletion bitmaps and ID maps. The 1.5× figure covers modest HNSW settings; aggressive M values or huge metadata can double it, which is why we call it a heuristic.

Quantization economics

Product or scalar quantization shrinks footprints 4–32× with modest recall loss, often making the difference between one beefy node and a cluster. Disk-backed indexes extend the trade to storage, swapping cheap disk for higher query latency.

The math behind this calculator

raw = vectors × dims × bytes/dim withIndex = raw × 1.5 (HNSW-style heuristic)

Each vector occupies dimensions × bytes-per-dimension; multiply by count for the raw payload. Approximate nearest-neighbor structures add links, metadata and load-factor slack, so a stated 1.5× multiplier estimates realistic memory; labeled a heuristic because HNSW parameters and engines vary widely.

Assumptions & limitations

  • 1.5× index/memory overhead is a named heuristic, not a guarantee.
  • Metadata payloads and IDs not included.
  • Quantization trades recall for footprint; benchmark before committing.

Worked example

One million 1536-dimension fp32 vectors occupy about 5.72 GiB raw, roughly 8.58 GiB once typical index overhead lands; provision ~9 GiB of RAM.

Frequently asked questions

Does this include document text storage?
No; only vector payloads plus index structure. Source documents usually live in cheaper object storage beside the index.
Why GiB instead of GB?
Memory provisioning uses binary GiB; mixing decimal GB into RAM planning under-provisions nodes by ~7%.
How accurate is 1.5× really?
Directionally right for common setups. Measure your engine after load tests; Qdrant/pgvector/Milvus publish their own overhead guidance.

Related calculators